Seeing on whats there on the horizon with them new rigs, upgrades and whatsoever. But now that I tested the "next best thing" to Shadow, it really opened my eyes on how much of an amazing system we got and how much work, passion and love Blade is putting into it. big shoutout to all those lovable souls here.Īw man, this sounds so much like "Shadow fanboy"-talk. Even when people ask for more storage for the hundredth time and I could explode internally, people keep calm and take their time to help them. I know that doesn't bother a lot of people, I get that, but it always feels like renting a DVD that only has the flick itself on the disc and no extras.Īlso, whenever I need help, advice or can GIVE both, this reddit is so welcoming and supportive. but it wasn't pretty.Īnd for me, mods, ReShade and other stuff that can improve games, are out of question on GeForce NOW and Stadia. Like watching a 720p video on a Full HD-TV I would say. I am not bullshitting you when is say, image-quality was. Played Assassin's Creed: Oddysey, Far Cry 5 and CS:GO on GeForce NOW. And from my experience, the quality ingame is so much better. Has some hiccups every now and then, but it works. And yet, they are currently the pioneers of game streaming.Īnd overall. Google Stadia and GeForce NOW have some BIG names behind them. Yes, we face a lot more than necessary amount of downtimes & error-screens.īut Shadow aims for an completely different product. we do know they (Blade) are working their asses off to deliver this outstanding product. We all know what we got with Shadow and we all know where work is needed. No idea wether its their hardware or my (freakin good) internet connection. Nothing to tweak, no settings, no working shortcuts. UI? Shortcuts? Anything? Once in the game, you're in. GeForce NOW CONs - Streaming/Image-quality really, and I mean this, is shitty. Not much PC usage know-how needed -> Casual friendly. GeForce NOW PROs - Quick access (Add game, hit start, play) ((Once a client has been startet at least once)) - Storage? Dont care about that one. So what I have to say is 100% from the point-of-view of an gamer. So does Shadow, but the overall experience I had with Shadow was 10 times more satisfying compared to GeForce Now. recently I got my hands on the GeForce NOW Beta and was very curious how they approach this topic.Īnd let me say this right from the beginning: In it's current state. And games will 100% go the same way (imo).ĪNYWAY. To me, yes, it IS the future of entertainment and the way people will consume their media. When first steps were announced way back (Gaikai, OnLive, etc.) I was excited from the get go. I use my Shadow on daily basis and it took some time, but I am standing completely behind the whole idea of streaming. In the comparison of GPUs, it is really important which of them - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti or Intel HD Graphics 4600 - is better for games with different system settings.I'm a Shadow user for quite some time now. Uncertain – There is a little information for making FPS statistics. Uncertain – There is a lack of information for data analysis. May Run Fluently – The perfect balance of gaming performance and technical specifications of the GPU. The graphics accelerator will run at less than 40 frames per sec.įluent – The GPU efficiently copes with the detailed drawing of more than 60 frames per sec. It is a poor result by now.įluent – Here are the average system requirements. Some lags are possible even at low monitor resolution.įluent – The GPU is able to draw from 20 to 30 frames per sec. May Stutter – The system requirements are not compatible with the GPU. Stutter – Too low performance of the GPU is not able to draw 5 frames per sec to the full extent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |